Thank you for helping us by reporting bad content.
Let me just start out by saying, this photo of her looks NOTHING like Katy Perry. When I saw the photo and read the article, I thought they got the picture wrong lol. I mean the girl on the cover looks more like Amy Winehouse than it does Katy Perry. They went overboard on all the Photoshop and the sad thing is that Katy looks so good naturally, why would they need so much airbrushing?
The picture of Katy here is for the March edition of Interview magazine. In the photo, she looks sexy with a bedazzled studded silver bra on. She also wore long black gloves and some dangling chandelier earrings. For her makeup, Katy switched it up and put on some thick winged dark black eyeliner, dark eyebrows, some pale lipstick and she kept her black hair (I thought her hair was blue? ) in a teased style.
I think she looks really good on the cover. She looks sexy and seductive without going overboard. I love the colors of the picture. I really must complain that this photo does not look like Katy and I hate that they did that too her. If I didn`t see the name of this photo, there is no way that I would have thought that it was Katy Perry on the cover.. I think it`s so sad that companies and magazines must photoshop all their photos so much. This goes to show how much other photos must be photoshopped in their magazines. This makes me sad... =(
How do you guys feel about the picture and the huge amount of photoshop put on it?